4 ms·
It's weird to me that GitHub doesn't have larger machines types available for actions yet. I don't want to bother with a self-hosted runner just to get more CPU
by ewhauser421 4y ago
It's weird to me that GitHub doesn't have larger machines types available for actions yet. I don't want to bother with a self-hosted runner just to get more CPUs. They have much larger machines available for Codespaces - why not actions? I'm happy to pay for them.
- thinkafterbef 4y agoHey founder of BuildJet here, With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions
- otterley 4y agoAny arm64 resources in the works?
- white_dragon88 4y ago[dead]
- hayd 4y agoI this is in preview, I've seen it in a few projects (ubuntu-latest-xl), so perhaps we'll see wider release soon?