4 ms·
Yes there are plenty of those. And if they then blatantly state that they are not open source because they don't want somebody to build a business on their prod
by wildmanx 5y ago
Yes there are plenty of those. And if they then blatantly state that they are not open source because they don't want somebody to build a business on their product while that's exactly what they are doing, then they lost me as well.
I really like what you guys are working on, and I'd absolutely give it a try. But this is really a deal breaker here. Make the team-oriented features proprietary that need server space and accounts and all that, open-source the rest and enable it to run offline. Maybe not tomorrow, I get that. But the moment you do this will open the dams. Until then, you'll stay in a niche.
- kreetx 5y agoAs pointed out elsewhere, the product (with waiting list) was announced here 8 months ago where open-sourcing was suggested (privacy and security and all that), but it seems that it hasn't been important to them.