My post wasn't saying that my entire point was provable, just that it was specifically trivial to show you can create great work without that suffering. If you

My post wasn't saying that my entire point was provable, just that it was specifically trivial to show you can create great work without that suffering. If you can't think of a single example of a valuable thing being made by a company without an abusive auteur CEO, then I guess we see "value" very differently. The rest of my post argues that there is no way to justify that harm given we know the work can be achieved without it.