> On top of that, you also proceeded to say that $2 billion in property damage and "mostly peaceful" can co-exist. Sorry, but $2 billion (with a "b") in propert

> On top of that, you also proceeded to say that $2 billion in property damage and "mostly peaceful" can co-exist. Sorry, but $2 billion (with a "b") in property damage and a much larger - but difficult to quantify - amount from lost business and other collateral damage is far too great to make the allowance of "mostly peaceful". Sorry, those things can obviously co-exist, otherwise you're in nonsense territory where everything is tainted because everything has nuts associated with it. So the question is: how many people participated in the protests, how many damaged property, and (in this case) how many of those where just exploiting the situation to pursue other goals (e.g. boogaloo bois). If the peaceful fraction is in "most" territory, then they were "mostly peaceful."