3 ms·
You have changed the question. Russia has banned foreign media, in addition to restricting local media to publishing the government view. Since I'm British, a
by Symbiote 5y ago
You have changed the question.
Russia has banned foreign media, in addition to restricting local media to publishing the government view.
Since I'm British, and you'd probably consider the US and UK equivalent for this purpose, here's a major British newspaper article arguing against NATO action in Libya: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/23/nothing-moral-nato-intervention-libya https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/23/nothin...
(Given https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardian_US https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardian_US, it probably counts for the US anyway.)
- NoOn3 5y agoI understand that Russian ban of foreign media is not good, but some west countries banned Russian media too and created special difficulties for them early...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- yywwbbn 5y agoGenerally I don’t support limiting free speech or even banning Russia TV channels in this case. But let’s not pretend that quasi independent government propaganda department are equivalent to western media companies.
- NoOn3 5y agoAs a Russian that make me sad that our media uses such a very hacky work strategy, sometimes add fakes some times try to color clearly events in the beneficial side. But I think that it's clearly in Russian media and Russian political view point has some clear truths that Western media not always want to show and our media could have represented their point of view much better. But I saw fakes in western media too, and quite often, although perhaps in smaller quantities... I even know one News TV presenter on Russian central channel it's strange, but it seems to me that he never say fakes, does not try to embellish events in one direction or another, but it only airs on Saturday evenings news and then not every time.