The article miscalculates the data rate as "584KB/s (Kilobytes/s)" when the numbers actually give 554kb/s (using the patent's 5776 bits per square). This is kil

The article miscalculates the data rate as "584KB/s (Kilobytes/s)" when the numbers actually give 554kb/s (using the patent's 5776 bits per square). This is kilobits per second, not kilobytes per second. The incorrect kilobytes number is more than enough for 6 channels of uncompressed CD quality audio, but the real number requires lossy compression.