3 ms·
> It was simply the cheapest, most reliable source of energy. What about the nuclear reactors that DE chose to shut down for Russian natural gas?
by rs999gti 5y ago
> It was simply the cheapest, most reliable source of energy.
What about the nuclear reactors that DE chose to shut down for Russian natural gas?
- type0 5y agoYou can thank huge Russia funded "green" movement for that
- panick21_ 5y agoGerman were incredibly anti-nuclear long before. Blaming this on Russia is nonsense.
- t98241hr3240o4w 5y agoAnd nuclear is anything but cheaper, full green glasses down but just looking economically - stop that myth :(
- panick21_ 5y agoNuclear might not have been competitive against gas or coal but nothing was. Funny how everybody is willing to pay extra and throw decades of support behind solar/wind but not nuclear. And nuclear if you actually produce them in larger numbers it actually gets quite cheap. Had Germany spend all the money they put into solar/wind into nuclear 20 years ago they would be finishing 1-2 nuclear reactor each year right now.
- rs999gti 5y agoDE doesn't want anything nuclear - they just vetoed to keep their existing nuclear plants online, even with their huge dependence on Russian gas - https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-ministries-say-cannot-recommend-extending-nuclear-plants-lifetime-2022-03-08/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-ministries-say-c... DE wants to instead setup other renewables, such as wind, at Tesla speed. Comparing DE government bureaucracy to Musk's Tesla is ludicrous.
- jsnodlin 5y ago