3 ms·
I do think this was the correct ruling and applying maximum damage was the correct remedy. Oberlin still thinks it was correct in allowing and encouraging emplo
by tannedNerd 5y ago
I do think this was the correct ruling and applying maximum damage was the correct remedy. Oberlin still thinks it was correct in allowing and encouraging employee to libel and defame another entity and even cancel contracts without compensation.
If anyone thinks this way about Student Free Speech you have to have willing and purposefully choose to stick your head in the sand and ignore the fact that school admins acting in their official role and on the clock for Oberlin joined in these protests, even supplied material, and broke contracts without paying the penalty required by the contract.
- jstarfish 5y agoTo be fair, this is one of those situations where the school itself would find itself the next victim of the mob if they didn't side with it. It's just the way cancel culture works. * Students steal from bakery. * Students malign bakery through appeal to one-sided sensationalism. * Students go after everyone who does business with bakery, which implicates...Oberlin. * Oberlin shits their pants and joins the mob to avoid accusations of "supporting racism." The ruling is correct-- spinelessness is not a defense. But I don't envy anybody put in this position.
- samhyde69 5y agoSmall problem: Many true believers on planet Oberlin... (probably majority). Preference falsification is indeed a thing but you will never know if these actors lie predominantly to themselves or others to save their hide. Practically speaking, it doesn't matter
- JaimeThompson 5y agoHow long do you believe cancel culture has been going on for?
- tonfreed 5y agoAs long as wowsers have been trying to ban racy movies and comic books.
- 1270018080 5y agoSee it's only called cancel culture when you disagree with the event.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- SilasX 5y ago>Students steal from bakery. That's understating it -- they stole from the bakery, and assaulted the employee that tried to stop them, then ganged up to attack him on the ground[1]. It's a great illustration of Scott Alexander's Toxoplasma of Rage article[2], where you're left thinking, like, even if the store employees were discriminating, and even if you could make the case, why would you cite this incident as an example of it, where it manifestly was not discrimination, and the victim committed serious crimes? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson%27s_Bakery_v._Oberlin_College#2016_shoplifting_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson%27s_Bakery_v._Oberlin_C... [2] https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage...
- samhyde69 5y agoYou know why...Africans ha e become a religious object for awfls
- temp8964 5y agoActually in this case some of the school administrators themselves are also part of the little red guards. Don't just blame the "students". The colleges have been in the making of little red guards in decades, it is inevitable that some of the little red guards became school administrators.
- JaimeThompson 5y agowhat are "little red guards"?
- wpaladin 5y agoIt's a reference to Mao's Cultural Revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Guards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Guards
- JaimeThompson 5y agoThank you.