> You don’t need CNN for that. You have an archive of HN commentary from 2016 saying they’re “convinced” Trump was in bed with Russians. So? People, especially

> You don’t need CNN for that. You have an archive of HN commentary from 2016 saying they’re “convinced” Trump was in bed with Russians. So? People, especially amateurs, jump to unwarranted conclusions all the time. Being "'convinced' Trump was in bed with Russians" is the same kind of error being "convinced" that CNN was "lying" about it.