At a government level, you can not banish politics without infringing on speech. Your proposal directly conflicts with the first amendment. If Disinformation w

At a government level, you can not banish politics without infringing on speech. Your proposal directly conflicts with the first amendment. If Disinformation was simply promoting outdated chauvinism, it wouldn't be perceived as such a threat to society. But that's not what's happening. Disinformation campaigns are convincing people that the election was rigged and the current government is illegitimate. Even your "present all sides" idea has flaws because it's a tactic used in propaganda. You ostensibly take two "experts" and hold a mock debate. One of those experts is going to take a dive, looking like a fool, and as a result, your chosen side appears to prevail.