4 ms·
> but my primary interest is getting use-value (you could say utility, even!) That will come. I am trying to think of an example/metaphor of the Gestalt way
by nonrandomstring 5y ago
> but my primary interest is getting use-value (you could say utility,
even!)
That will come.
I am trying to think of an example/metaphor of the Gestalt way that
philosophy (and the pursuit of the other learning you mention)
obliquely and surprisingly pops into your life as a massive benefit.
Never, personally though, have I been seized by a "bare idea" and then
gone off and applied it to some utility (except maybe as a short-lived
cognitive behavioural experiment on myself).
Perhaps it's similar to how playing musical scales, painting bowls of
fruit, or playing chess, one day makes you a decent performer, painter
or strategist.
> Just wanting to play with and consider ideas is valid
At another extreme, only wanting to play, without even the end of
self-improvement in mind would be, as Nietzsche put it - an idle
museum of ideas for loafers in the garden of knowledge. Definitely not
a good use of time unless your only aim is to stave off nihilism for
one more day. So a middle path to tread...
respects
- beaconstudios 5y agoYou don't need to explain the benefit of a general philosophical education, friend - I have a few areas that I've learned about because I think they approach truth, while not being directly applicable. My ontological perspective is made up of a mix of Deleuze, Whitehead, Zen and cybernetics, for instance - it sits in the background guiding my perspective while not being 'a tool' as such. Agreed on the middle path; an education in the liberal arts can contribute to general development and actualisation.