While the whole idea of gameified communication is ridiculous, I really don't get your point. If someone feels so strongly about the issue that they want to se

While the whole idea of gameified communication is ridiculous, I really don't get your point. If someone feels so strongly about the issue that they want to send someone a kudos using the specifi words "union pay raises for slave labour", that's definitely something I'd want to encourage as much as possible of, because it is a strong indication I'm doing something wrong as a leader. You have to admit people won't use those words for fun in a professional environment. Those messages would be one of the most important signals uncovered by such a program. I just don't get why you'd want to bury it. ---- Though reading my own comment, it's clearly selection bias: leaders who encourage workers' open discussion of slave-like conditions would never institute slave-like conditions, and vice versa, I suppose.