3 ms·

> You seem to have responded that actually it wasn't because you could use it to download files of any type I'm not English native speaker, but I'm quite sure

> You seem to have responded that actually it wasn't because you could use it to download files of any type I'm not English native speaker, but I'm quite sure this sentence doesn't mean what you think it means. I'll quote it again > In earlier versions, images are displayed in separate windows, until NeXTSTEP's Text class gained support for Image objects BTW, yes, everything you see in a browser's webview is "downloaded", even today Inline or not, the web wasn't text only from inception (it was designed to support different media types according to the mime type mappings of the system, it's not a coincidence). Lee called it hypermedia browser, not hypertext. > years later it was able to display inline images by years later I think you mean by 1990 This [1] is from the NEXTSTEP Reference Volume 2 (published in 1990) read the last line [1] https://i.ibb.co/tB0jCtn/image.png https://i.ibb.co/tB0jCtn/image.png

kragen 5y ago
Even though the browser would guess MIME types based on filename, HTTP didn't have MIME types until HTTP 1.0; HTTP/0.9 as of 01992 still didn't have them: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Response.html https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Response.html I didn't use the NeXT WorldWideWeb browser, so I don't have firsthand knowledge, but in http://web.archive.org/web/20110131164401/http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/11/02/why-do-we-have-an-img-element http://web.archive.org/web/20110131164401/http://diveintomar... you can read TimBL commenting in 01993 about possible alternative ways of adding inline image support in ways that make it clear that he hadn't yet implemented any kind of inline image support. So I guess either the Wikipedia page is wrong or the page you posted is wrong about what NeXtStEp could support in 01990.
- peoplefromibiza 5y ago
  > Even though the browser would guess MIME types based on filename, HTTP didn't have MIME types until HTTP 1.0 correct but guessing the mime type is what many tools still do today MIME types were one of the (many) emergent features added to HTTP out of necessity like, for example, HEADERS HTTP/0.9 had no headers, no status code it was basically nothing more than - GET THAT - HERE IT IS ITS RAW CONTENT But Lee HyperMedia browser had support for different file types because he already envisioned it as a mean to browse a "web" of hosts in search of "resources of different kind" WWW was text only the same way Excel was text only, meaning they could not show text and images side by side, not in the sense "VT100 text only" Ask you this: was there another software that let you click on a link representing a file on another computer possibly on the other side of the planet, download it and show it to you in (almost) real time? This [1][2] is the best Microsoft could do using all its resources in 1990, on a platform that was already very advanced for graphics (Word 1.1 for Windows looks like sh*t), T.B.Lee was basically himself writing the code for the server, the client on a platform that was still in its infancy while also having to learn the framework (NeXTSTEP) [1] https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-word/webp/microsoft-word%5E1990%5Eword-4.0-mac-splash-screen.webp https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-... [2] https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-word/webp/microsoft-word%5E1990%5Eword-4.0-mac-text-editing.webp https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-... > or the page you posted is wrong about what NeXtStEp could support in 01990. you can check by yourself by buying (or downloading) a copy of the manual https://findingaids.library.cmu.edu/repositories/2/archival_objects/38591 https://findingaids.library.cmu.edu/repositories/2/archival_...
  - kragen 5y ago
    Oh, agreed. And when I started using the WWW in 01992 it was obvious that it was going to be a huge thing. But "visual paradigms already known from early-90s multimedia apps" is mutually exclusive with "they could not show text and images side by side". HyperCard, PowerPoint, and other "early-90s [or late-80s] multimedia apps" showed text and images side by side incessantly. Or sometimes on top of each other. There was "another software that let you click on a link representing a file on another computer possibly on the other side of the planet, download it and show it to you in (almost) real time"; specifically, Gopher, which came out at the same time as WWW. Can you elaborate on what you're saying about Word 4.0 for Macintosh?

kragen 5y ago

Even though the browser would guess MIME types based on filename, HTTP didn't have MIME types until HTTP 1.0; HTTP/0.9 as of 01992 still didn't have them: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Response.html https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Response.html I didn't use the NeXT WorldWideWeb browser, so I don't have firsthand knowledge, but in http://web.archive.org/web/20110131164401/http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/11/02/why-do-we-have-an-img-element http://web.archive.org/web/20110131164401/http://diveintomar... you can read TimBL commenting in 01993 about possible alternative ways of adding inline image support in ways that make it clear that he hadn't yet implemented any kind of inline image support. So I guess either the Wikipedia page is wrong or the page you posted is wrong about what NeXtStEp could support in 01990.

peoplefromibiza 5y ago
> Even though the browser would guess MIME types based on filename, HTTP didn't have MIME types until HTTP 1.0 correct but guessing the mime type is what many tools still do today MIME types were one of the (many) emergent features added to HTTP out of necessity like, for example, HEADERS HTTP/0.9 had no headers, no status code it was basically nothing more than - GET THAT - HERE IT IS ITS RAW CONTENT But Lee HyperMedia browser had support for different file types because he already envisioned it as a mean to browse a "web" of hosts in search of "resources of different kind" WWW was text only the same way Excel was text only, meaning they could not show text and images side by side, not in the sense "VT100 text only" Ask you this: was there another software that let you click on a link representing a file on another computer possibly on the other side of the planet, download it and show it to you in (almost) real time? This [1][2] is the best Microsoft could do using all its resources in 1990, on a platform that was already very advanced for graphics (Word 1.1 for Windows looks like sh*t), T.B.Lee was basically himself writing the code for the server, the client on a platform that was still in its infancy while also having to learn the framework (NeXTSTEP) [1] https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-word/webp/microsoft-word%5E1990%5Eword-4.0-mac-splash-screen.webp https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-... [2] https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-word/webp/microsoft-word%5E1990%5Eword-4.0-mac-text-editing.webp https://www.versionmuseum.com/images/applications/microsoft-... > or the page you posted is wrong about what NeXtStEp could support in 01990. you can check by yourself by buying (or downloading) a copy of the manual https://findingaids.library.cmu.edu/repositories/2/archival_objects/38591 https://findingaids.library.cmu.edu/repositories/2/archival_...
- kragen 5y ago
  Oh, agreed. And when I started using the WWW in 01992 it was obvious that it was going to be a huge thing. But "visual paradigms already known from early-90s multimedia apps" is mutually exclusive with "they could not show text and images side by side". HyperCard, PowerPoint, and other "early-90s [or late-80s] multimedia apps" showed text and images side by side incessantly. Or sometimes on top of each other. There was "another software that let you click on a link representing a file on another computer possibly on the other side of the planet, download it and show it to you in (almost) real time"; specifically, Gopher, which came out at the same time as WWW. Can you elaborate on what you're saying about Word 4.0 for Macintosh?