3 ms·
You don't verify the hardware directly. You provide a mechanism for client certificate validation (I issue the certs, I can assert that they're tied to hardware
by mjg59 5y ago
You don't verify the hardware directly. You provide a mechanism for client certificate validation (I issue the certs, I can assert that they're tied to hardware), and you provide a callback for validating device state (I define the validation policy, I compare that against the data that I have and say yes or no). It's not about services taking responsibility for this themselves, it's about providing mechanisms for customers to have their own policies enforced.
- 3np 5y agoYou are talking about SGX-style TEEs, is that correct? Effectively putting hardware manufacturers as ultimate issuers with corresponding ultimate authority (ie spoofing, revocation, tracking) Or if not, how would you envision it?