> "We have patents required to implement AV1." "Which patents?" "We're not telling. But they're real, take our word for it." Sounds like FUD to me. Wat. Yeah.

> "We have patents required to implement AV1." "Which patents?" "We're not telling. But they're real, take our word for it." Sounds like FUD to me. Wat. Yeah. I hear "patent pool", I go "okay, just for orientation let me see an itemized breakdown of the fee schedule." That's the logical continuation of that conversation. In my head, anyway. I'm just a curious observer who wants to understand how much licensors are paying in practice by understanding what they're paying for.