> This would also need to investigate contributory negligence. For example, the sidewalk may have been safe for the legal uses of the sidewalk but dangerous for

> This would also need to investigate contributory negligence. For example, the sidewalk may have been safe for the legal uses of the sidewalk but dangerous for the illegal use of scooters. One could argue that it is not about legal use, but the expectations of use. Is it reasonable to expect people to ride scooters and bicycles on sidewalks regardless of legality? In this case, the rider could sue the city and the city could then sue the manufacturer of the scooter for making a dangerous product and causing the city harm. However, Did the city approve use of and leasing of scooters? If so, why did they do this knowing that they may not be able to maintain the sidewalks and roads to a level that is safe for these types of vehicles? Personally, I do not allow my children to ride scooters because the wheels are too small in diameter to handle basic potholes, concrete heaving, roots etc.