Does this necessarily improve your accuracy though? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-19/apple-s-underdog-analysts-outperform-wall-street-from-helsinki-car

Does this necessarily improve your accuracy though? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-19/apple-s-underdog-analysts-outperform-wall-street-from-helsinki-caracas.html http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-19/apple-s-underdog-an... http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/01/19/apples-blow-out-quarter-the-bloggers-called-it-the-street-blew-it-2/ http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/01/19/apples-blow-out-quart... This is one of the reasons I like to follow Apple to much. The majority of people apply the same old presumptions and rules to them and yet Apple consistently proves them wrong. Rather than adjusting their understanding of the market, most people simply repeat their mistakes. It seems the people who realise something else is going on is in the minority. What gives? I am definitely a fan of their products. But I try hard not to let that influence whether I think Apple will succeed or not.