2 ms·
That is really interesting. For me the counter-value strategy seems like a more effective deterrent though from a MAD/counter-attack perspective. It's meant to
by jpgvm 5y ago
That is really interesting.
For me the counter-value strategy seems like a more effective deterrent though from a MAD/counter-attack perspective. It's meant to be a terrifying outcome and maximally terrifying is the best possible configuration to prevent nuclear war.
There is only ~500 cities in the world with over 1mil population, Russia has over 5k operational nukes. That is ~10 nukes for every large city on Earth. If they were only interested in nuking the US that is still ~100 nukes per US state.