4 ms·
> Why would you recommend that? [..] It's a bunch of work for no benefit. nanobind/pybind11 (co-)author here. The space of python bindings is extremely diverse
by wjakob 5y ago
> Why would you recommend that? [..] It's a bunch of work for no benefit.
nanobind/pybind11 (co-)author here. The space of python bindings is extremely diverse and on the whole probably looks very different from your use case. nanobind/pybind11 target the 'really fancy' case you mention specifically for codebases that are "at home" in C++, but which want natural Pythonic bindings. There is near-zero overlap with Cython.
- erwincoumans 5y agoYes, I assumed everyone who cares about performance (or who writes large programs) is also a C++ or CUDA programmer. Don't tell me that is not the case :-)