3 ms·

Twitter agrees! You are not banned from that platform for ridiculing anyone.

bko 5y ago
Twitter suspended someone for saying "Ok dude..." [0] https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ok-dude-twitter-suspends-rapper-zuby-for-hateful-tweet-at-transgender-antifa-activist https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ok-dude-twitter-susp...
- TameAntelope 5y ago
  @ZubyMusic tweeted 44 minutes ago, so no he was not banned.
  - stjohnswarts 5y ago
    I guess that the "appeal" was ruled reasonable and zuby made it back? Of course Washington Examiner will never follow up on the matter as they're well known, like Fox, to print front page knee jerks and way-back-page retractions.
    - tekknik 5y ago
      - TameAntelope 5y ago
        Washington Examiner is not known for its accurate reporting. [0] [0] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
        tekknik 5y ago
        Sure, but it doesn’t change what I wrote. In fact your non-peer reviewed site had this to say about CNN: “ CNN typically utilizes loaded emotional words in sensational headlines such as this: Trump pounces on Justice Department report findings.” https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/ So are we gonna be biased or call every guilty party out?
        TameAntelope 5y ago
        So you're saying, "What about CNN?" then? [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
        tekknik 5y ago
        Or just disproving your statement. Depending on your mental capacity. Or was your statement made such that only the right wing makes such headlines? Or are you russian and just trying to sow division? Which is it? Also you still didn’t change what I said, just avoided it by trying to claim “whataboutism”. Fight it all you want, it’s not going to change the truth.
        TameAntelope 5y ago
        Which statement does, "What about CNN?" disprove?
        tekknik 5y ago
        Your implication that only Fox spits out clickbait. You seem to be dead set on hiding behind whataboutism and ignoring the facts. You want to smear Fox’s name, but fight veraciously to defend CNN. That’s all anybody needs to know, and is clearly on display in your comments here.

bko 5y ago

Twitter suspended someone for saying "Ok dude..." [0] https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ok-dude-twitter-suspends-rapper-zuby-for-hateful-tweet-at-transgender-antifa-activist https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ok-dude-twitter-susp...

TameAntelope 5y ago
@ZubyMusic tweeted 44 minutes ago, so no he was not banned.
- stjohnswarts 5y ago
  I guess that the "appeal" was ruled reasonable and zuby made it back? Of course Washington Examiner will never follow up on the matter as they're well known, like Fox, to print front page knee jerks and way-back-page retractions.
  - tekknik 5y ago
    - TameAntelope 5y ago
      Washington Examiner is not known for its accurate reporting. [0] [0] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
      - tekknik 5y ago
        Sure, but it doesn’t change what I wrote. In fact your non-peer reviewed site had this to say about CNN: “ CNN typically utilizes loaded emotional words in sensational headlines such as this: Trump pounces on Justice Department report findings.” https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/ So are we gonna be biased or call every guilty party out?
        TameAntelope 5y ago
        So you're saying, "What about CNN?" then? [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
        tekknik 5y ago
        Or just disproving your statement. Depending on your mental capacity. Or was your statement made such that only the right wing makes such headlines? Or are you russian and just trying to sow division? Which is it? Also you still didn’t change what I said, just avoided it by trying to claim “whataboutism”. Fight it all you want, it’s not going to change the truth.
        TameAntelope 5y ago
        Which statement does, "What about CNN?" disprove?
        tekknik 5y ago
        Your implication that only Fox spits out clickbait. You seem to be dead set on hiding behind whataboutism and ignoring the facts. You want to smear Fox’s name, but fight veraciously to defend CNN. That’s all anybody needs to know, and is clearly on display in your comments here.