I get the feeling that GP was responding more to the article than to the project. The article spends a lot of words suggesting the project makes all other DOOM

I get the feeling that GP was responding more to the article than to the project. The article spends a lot of words suggesting the project makes all other DOOM ports obsolete. Definitely the title suggests that. And given that value judgment I think it's plenty reasonable to offer a critique of "this project is technically impressive but leaves me wanting aesthetically." I suspect if a different article (say, the project GitHub) had been submitted the comments here would be much different.