> but because it was cheaper to train crossbowmen And the difference was massive. It took years and years of dedicated training to become a good archer, someth

> but because it was cheaper to train crossbowmen And the difference was massive. It took years and years of dedicated training to become a good archer, something you start from childhood. The average peasant didnt have the time just do this on the side. As a result they were often handsomely paid. Crossbows on the other hand could be maned by anyone and were usable in a few days. It was such a threat to the existing social order that the catholic church tried to ban its use against Christians for a while.