3 ms·
> without publicly denouncing the team's previous work. But I don't see a problem with denouncing bad things that companies have done in the past. If a compan
by stale2002 5y ago
> without publicly denouncing the team's previous work.
But I don't see a problem with denouncing bad things that companies have done in the past. If a company caused lots of problems, then it should deserve the condemnation for the bad things that it caused.
It deserves the condemnation because it caused bad things to happen.
- productceo 5y agoI disagree that merits outweighed the demerits in the case we are discussing here, but I respect your viewpoint.