4 ms·
The automation allowed running more trains than ever before using less personnel than ever before. You want the train company to keep 2x-3x personnel on hand j
by innocenat 5y ago
The automation allowed running more trains than ever before using less personnel than ever before.
You want the train company to keep 2x-3x personnel on hand just for days like this? Not to mentioned transition time.
- ncmncm 5y agoSo, run fewer trains. Fewer is better than none.
- innocenat 5y agoI am not familiar with European train, but it seems that they did? > The international trains are not affected by this failure. > The night trains can still run.
- akvadrako 5y agoThat isn't useful for 99% of passengers. He obviously meant run a reasonable percentage of trains, like 25-50%.
- innocenat 5y agoMaybe we have different definition of fewer trains, because I wouldn't expect more than 10% at most, realistically 2-3%. And those trains are probably already 2-3%.
- gpvos 5y agoMany international trains were actually not running. I haven't read up on the details yet as I was away this weekend, but I think it was only short cross-border routes that still worked, but not much more. The night trains only started up past midnight. And anyway, even if more than that had run, night trains and international trains only run on a small number of Dutch train routes. The three daytime long-distance international train routes are: Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerpen and onwards, Amsterdam-Arnhem-Duisburg and onwards, Amsterdam-Hengelo-Osnabrück and onwards (several intermediate stations omitted). The only domestic night service is Utrecht-Amsterdam-The Hague-Rotterdam. That's it. You can't fit any serious amount of domestic travel into those more than they already normally carry.