4 ms·
If the point is egalitarianism(which I believe is ostensibly the whole point), then both are wrong and need to change. We should be aiming for equal pay, rather
by tsol 5y ago
If the point is egalitarianism(which I believe is ostensibly the whole point), then both are wrong and need to change. We should be aiming for equal pay, rather than considering progress to be only when women outpace men
- mpweiher 5y agoNo, we should be aiming for people getting to make the tradeoffs they want when it comes to earnings and other life choices.
- UncleMeat 5y agoSure. But it is just interesting how "in a few small cases, women outperform men" is often considered a larger crisis than the multi-generational norm of men dominating various careers and fields.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 5y agoEgalitarianism would imply that 50% of metros have one outearning the other, as the differences would be noise. As opposed to the 91% of metros where men out earn women today in this age group.