4 ms·
> he repeatedly Surely the first occurrence led to a post-mortem which documented and forbed the practices that became known to be dangerous for production.
by NewEntryHN 5y ago
> he repeatedly
Surely the first occurrence led to a post-mortem which documented and forbed the practices that became known to be dangerous for production.
- electroly 5y agoYes, that is presumably what "after being explicitly told not to do that against the prod database" refers to.
- zeckalpha 5y agoAction items from a post mortem should not be “do better, human” but “prevent the humans from making this mistake, machine”
- ZephyrBlu 5y agoTrue, learning from your mistakes should be a given. In this case the person involved was completely ignorant though.
- rendaw 5y agoAnd missing details like, did his job require data analysis? Was he involved in coming up with the resolution in the post mortem, or was it done by someone unrelated?
- dsjoerg 5y agoMaybe. Unclear if it was documented or just told verbally.
- ivraatiems 5y agoI don't know for sure but I believe there was a PIP and so on.