2 ms·
This seems logically incoherent to me. Maybe I’m reading it wrong. But anyway here’s my version: Avoid making mistakes that harm others. Be aware that you will
by playpause 5y ago
This seems logically incoherent to me. Maybe I’m reading it wrong. But anyway here’s my version:
Avoid making mistakes that harm others. Be aware that you will make some anyway, and you won’t always recognise them as mistakes at the time. (If you take pride in having a spotless record, you’re liable to deceive yourself.) And when, on reflection, you realise you have harmed someone by mistake, figure out what you can do to 1) fix the harm and 2) prevent it happening again. And then tell them this plan in a way that commits you to it. That’s an apology. This way you make fewer and fewer harmful mistakes over time. The idea that someone can just “avoid mistakes in the first place” to avoid needing to apologise is dangerously lacking in humility, in my opinion.
- zozbot234 5y agoIt's not about taking pride or lacking in humility, but simply about not considering it "normal" to screw things up. If you don't think of screwups as something "everyone does anyway", fixing them and making damn sure they won't reoccur becomes second nature. You don't need more than a simple apology, because everything else is implied and a spoken commitment would be meaningless anyway.
- playpause 5y agoWhat I’m not getting is how you get from “making damn sure screwups won’t reoccur” to “you don’t need more than a simple apology” when a screwup occurs. These seem like opposing sentiments.