3 ms·
And a whole lot of "wait, what tree does this code map to again?" With lisp, there's no difficulty mapping: int main(int x) {foo()} to Method m = new M
by orib 18y ago
And a whole lot of "wait, what tree does this code map to again?"
With lisp, there's no difficulty mapping:
int main(int x) {foo()}
to
Method m = new Method(return:=new Type(int),
args := new ArgList(
new Arg(new Type(int),
new Name("x"))),
body := new Block(
.... I'm sure you get the point....
The syntax tree is apparent from the syntax.
(+ 1 2 (* 3 4))
Maps to:
'(+ 1 2 (* 3 4))