2 ms·
> You build as much new housing as you can afford to, and let older housing filter down to "affordable" levels. The question is what sort of housing you build.
by krisoft 5y ago
> You build as much new housing as you can afford to, and let older housing filter down to "affordable" levels.
The question is what sort of housing you build. You have a piece of dirt ready to be developed or re-developed. You can put there a mansion which will house one family with enough garden to picnic a whole village and still have space to land a helicopter. Or you can build four detached homes with plenty of garden at the same place. Or you can build two 3-story buildings with 6 flats each and have space for a small comunal park between them.
And we can’t say that the market should figure out what kind of houses should be built, because we already have tax laws, and building codes, and etc which heavily influences what kind of building gets built. The question is not “should we put our finger on the scale” but “which direction should said finger push”?
- zozbot234 5y agoYou should build whatever puts the land at its "highest and best use". In any area with high housing costs, this will generally mean building the two 3-story condos. Which is why flats are generally found in cities where housing costs a lot, and large mansions are common in rural areas - market choice does a fine job of this already.
- rdtwo 5y agoYeah they problem is that highest and best use is probably also highest risk and longest flow so most builders just opt to put up a McMansion or 2, make their 20-30% and move to the next project