3 ms·
You're contradicting yourself. Either you have used `--allfilters-b --pal_sort=120 --mt-deflate=$(nproc)` and the quoted text in my previous post is true, or yo
by bmn__ 5y ago
You're contradicting yourself. Either you have used `--allfilters-b --pal_sort=120 --mt-deflate=$(nproc)` and the quoted text in my previous post is true, or you haven't, and then the quote is false.
- bscphil 5y ago> compressing them as much as I could Yes, this is technically not 100% true, it's just 99.9% true. Previous tests have found those additional options to provide negligible improvement in compression. Very rarely do I get even 1% more compression out of enabling all of them compared to ect's highest built-in compression level (`-9`). Basically what I'm getting at is that ect seems to hit the point of diminishing returns much quicker than anything I've personally tested. I'm curious if you have found a tool that achieves the same or better compression more quickly, that's why I asked.