3 ms·
I understand "horrible" in this case in a somewhat lighthearted sense. But it points to a tendency to simplify cultural complexity in the interest of "legibilit
by sriku 5y ago
I understand "horrible" in this case in a somewhat lighthearted sense. But it points to a tendency to simplify cultural complexity in the interest of "legibility" from the system perspective. The same diversity of cases need to be accommodated in much design done for, say, a diverse country like India where though urban populace me be English savvy, rural populace aren't necessarily so ... And even in urban areas local language and culture dominates.
A place this diversity crops up most commonly is the so called "standard" firstname middlename lastname fields. This just doesn't work in India where people may have even 7 components to their names ... and who are you, dear system developer, to dictate what their name should be like.
The name structure diversity I understand is a problem for Europe too with hyphenated names. This brilliant sketch by Fry and Laurie says it all - https://youtu.be/1LopIroSjsU https://youtu.be/1LopIroSjsU
- wincy 5y agoI mean, we get to dictate it because we’re writing the code and don’t know? I guess enterprising Indian developers should help it get fixed. As the whole world gets online this stuff gets sorted out, eventually. It’s not as if it’s malice or something. There are Americans with longer names though, I had a friend whose full name was five words, and all of his sisters and brothers also had “three middle names”.
- sriku 5y agoNot malice ... rather incompetence. If we can't handle this much accessibility, what hope do we have of making "ethical AI"?