5 ms·
I never said you couldn't sue them. Those of us who would rather not waste the kind of time and money needed to sue an electronics manufacturer would prefer a
by thr0wawayf00 5y ago
I never said you couldn't sue them.
Those of us who would rather not waste the kind of time and money needed to sue an electronics manufacturer would prefer a return option instead.
- thfuran 5y agoWhy should it be the retailers' problem?
- tux1968 5y agoBecause they sold it to you. They're who set the price and took your money. They sold you defective goods. Why shouldn't it be their problem?
- thfuran 5y agoBut they didn't sell defective goods. They sold goods that were fit for purpose, and then the manufacturer deliberately destroyed them.
- tux1968 5y agoThat's between them and their suppliers. They should have picked better suppliers who didn't put them into the position they now find themselves.
- heavyset_go 5y agoSounds like a reason the retailer should either work it out with, or sue, the manufacturer.
- thaumasiotes 5y ago> But they didn't sell defective goods. They sold goods that were fit for purpose, and then the manufacturer deliberately destroyed them. You don't see the manufacturer's ability to reach out and destroy the item you've already purchased as a defect in the item?
- mdoms 5y agoIf I buy a Google Home from JB Hifi I am not Google's customer, I am JB Hifi's customer. If they don't want to deal with a huge load of refund claims for Google products they are free not to sell them.
- Bud 5y agoIf the retailer is the only available target, they're a fair target. Make it clear that these products will cost them money if they try to sell them, and they'll stop selling them.