Misleading? That is exactly her point. That back in 1951, casinos were seen as predatory, any individual agency defense was rejected. She's lamenting the fact t

Misleading? That is exactly her point. That back in 1951, casinos were seen as predatory, any individual agency defense was rejected. She's lamenting the fact that in subsequent decades, conservatism was utterly defeated by the proliferation of casinos. > People said that casinos and slot parlors took advantage of traits that every human possesses... Abstract notions of freedom of commerce were not assumed to be a defense.