>Hats off for describing Boneh's fault attack paper as "completely theoretical", though! Bold! You stopped quoting too soon. I described it as a "completely th

>Hats off for describing Boneh's fault attack paper as "completely theoretical", though! Bold! You stopped quoting too soon. I described it as a "completely theoretical hardware attack". In practice it would have to be some sort of glitch attack capable of causing actual bit flips. My point is that it has nothing to do with RSA implementation as it was described in the article.