3 ms·
The challenge is that in some states, employer suits attorney fees are paid by the employer. So employees can hire an attorney on spec to threaten the company,
by mchusma 5y ago
The challenge is that in some states, employer suits attorney fees are paid by the employer. So employees can hire an attorney on spec to threaten the company, and say "pay us less than the cost for you to defend this suit and win, and we will go away". So you put the company in a situation where:
- if they win they are out maybe -$100k
- if they lose, they are out maybe -$250k
(Assuming the dispute is about $50k).
And in many areas companies must hire attorneys to represent them. They can't represent themselves.
I'm all for resolving actual issues, and I think the solution here is:
- make it so parties do not need to hire attorneys
- use things like fairclaims.com to arbitrate (must faster and cheaper)
- hotpotamus 5y agoOr just give everyone you fire $10-50K in non-disparagement/severance/hush money to go away. That's what I've seen that worked fairly well.
- Aachen 5y ago> things like <brand> to arbitrate Having commercial companies sit in a judge's seat is so dystopian I haven't even read the idea in any fiction yet. This is the second time I come across it, previous time was when someone pointed out that the Epic Store has such a clause in the TOS.