3 ms·
Why not extend this same criterion to the work itself? I mean you can’t really trust that any developer is writing the best code at any given point in time so i
by gcheong 5y ago
Why not extend this same criterion to the work itself? I mean you can’t really trust that any developer is writing the best code at any given point in time so it would seem at least a minimum of 5 or 6 developers should weigh in on any given pull request. Maybe that is the way it works there idk and probably never will.
- khazhoux 5y agoIt's extremely common to have that many +1's required for a PR that touches several parts of the codebase. And fixing a bad commit doesn't require 6 months of emotionally draining work.