16 ms·
> each codebase will use a completely different set of bazillion optional features making each codebase look like an entirely different language The issue is e
by mattgreenrocks 5y ago
> each codebase will use a completely different set of bazillion optional features making each codebase look like an entirely different language
The issue is each codebase has its own DSL?
That is pretty close to the case with all non-C++ langs: industry settles on a handful of frameworks which are syntactically similar but each has their own gotchas.
- jcelerier 5y ago> The issue is each codebase has its own DSL It's not "an issue", it's in my opinion the very best development methodology there is: develop eDSLs for every sub-problems in the system
- mattgreenrocks 5y agoAgreed. It’s perceived as an issue because it contradicts the desirable illusion that standardizing on tools would fix the software problem.