> lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI It should be noted that it "can be", not it always is. The implementation in question [1] is currentl

> lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI It should be noted that it "can be", not it always is. The implementation in question [1] is currently experimental and not what you get from cjxl. In any case it is worth noting that QOI inspired both FPNG and FJXL. [1] https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main/experimental/fast_lossless https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main/experimental/fast...