3 ms·
It's worth adding that lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI (at the same time == Pareto improvement). It basically obsoletes QOI. There are
by pornel 5y ago
It's worth adding that lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI (at the same time == Pareto improvement). It basically obsoletes QOI.
There are also special-case trimmed-down PNG encoders that are in the same league as QOI in terms of compression and simplicity.
- lifthrasiir 5y ago> lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI It should be noted that it "can be", not it always is. The implementation in question [1] is currently experimental and not what you get from cjxl. In any case it is worth noting that QOI inspired both FPNG and FJXL. [1] https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main/experimental/fast_lossless https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main/experimental/fast...