3 ms·
Awesome! Also, a PSA about the next image format for the web: JPEG XL (.jxl) - should be on everyone's radar. Already supported by browsers (behind a feature fl
by yboris 5y ago
Awesome! Also, a PSA about the next image format for the web: JPEG XL (.jxl) - should be on everyone's radar. Already supported by browsers (behind a feature flag). Has lossy and lossless mode.
https://jpegxl.info/ https://jpegxl.info/
https://cloudinary.com/blog/time_for_next_gen_codecs_to_dethrone_jpeg https://cloudinary.com/blog/time_for_next_gen_codecs_to_deth...
- pornel 5y agoIt's worth adding that lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI (at the same time == Pareto improvement). It basically obsoletes QOI. There are also special-case trimmed-down PNG encoders that are in the same league as QOI in terms of compression and simplicity.
- lifthrasiir 5y ago> lossless JXL can be faster and compress better than QOI It should be noted that it "can be", not it always is. The implementation in question [1] is currently experimental and not what you get from cjxl. In any case it is worth noting that QOI inspired both FPNG and FJXL. [1] https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main/experimental/fast_lossless https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/tree/main/experimental/fast...