3 ms·
If you read her questions in that case her bias and attempt to set up justification for her own preconceived opinion were clear.
by CuriouslyC 5y ago
If you read her questions in that case her bias and attempt to set up justification for her own preconceived opinion were clear.
- rayiner 5y agoIt’s not a “bias” to believe the Constitution doesn’t contain a right to privacy that protects abortion. That’s just being able to read. Pretty much nobody seriously believes in the logic underlying Roe. It’s the Lochner of left-wing jurisprudence. Even Ginsberg criticized the case, and offered a different justification for abortion rights. At this point it’s just stare decisis and ideology sustaining the precedent. Accusations of “bias” and “preconceived opinion” are absolutely hilarious coming from the left. Republican judges regularly get wobbly and vote for the liberal position (Obergefell, Bostock, Woman’s Health. The liberal judges, however, always vote party line in these cases.)
- saalweachter 5y agoThe enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.