3 ms·
Viability isn't whether they can afford it, sadly. It's whether they consider the negative effects of not doing it to overwhelm the cost of doing it. In this c
by GekkePrutser 5y ago
Viability isn't whether they can afford it, sadly. It's whether they consider the negative effects of not doing it to overwhelm the cost of doing it.
In this case they won't lose much income from a small channel and people will continue to use their service so purely financially it's a sound decision.
It's also a dick move to their users but big corporations don't have morals. Just shareholders.
Remember both the content creators and consumers aren't their customers. We're just assets for the real customers, the advertisers. Google is the farmer and we're the cattle.
- ascar 5y agoI mean I don't disagree with your reasoning, but the economic viability was brought up as an argument against legislation forcing them to do it. So in that context it's certainly about affordability.