4 ms·
Their timing is shit, with spacex able to take up some of the slack their bargaining position is weaker. Plus if they ISS does have to be abandoned the other na
by celticninja 5y ago
Their timing is shit, with spacex able to take up some of the slack their bargaining position is weaker. Plus if they ISS does have to be abandoned the other nations could afford a replacement, Russia will be lucky if they can afford to launch any rockets without someone else (western nations or companies) footing part of the bill. China and India have their own space agencies and no one will want to tie themselves to russian technology which is a) almost 50 years old and b) is used as a bargaining chip in international relations. Thus is likely the death of the Russian space age.
- gus_massa 5y ago> a) almost 50 years old That's a feature, not a bug. The Soyuz are well tested and they don't explode. The last fatal accident was in 1971. Also, they changed many parts under the hood and keep the name. They don't have a fancy vertical landing of the first stage (like the Falcom of SpaceX), but at least they have a scape capsule that saved a few crews (not like the Space Shuttle)