3 ms·
I've never understood why x.509 authorisation certificates aren't more widely used for this. They're off-line, self sufficiently asserted in the connection cont
by justinjlynn 5y ago
I've never understood why x.509 authorisation certificates aren't more widely used for this. They're off-line, self sufficiently asserted in the connection context, stacking, are unopinionated about application semantics in terms of authorisation rules/grants/restrictions, have well tested infrastructure for parsing and validation, and can use ocsp stapling for validity, and ct logs for audit. They're used in CERN VOMS, etc. and seem like a great fit for distributed systems doing authorisation but they don't seem widely known or used.
- mozey 5y agoBecause it's not so easy to setup and manage? Maybe it will become more popular with tools like https://github.com/gravitational/teleport https://github.com/gravitational/teleport
- justinjlynn 5y agoThat's true. Honestly, it's probably almost entirely down to the fact that the openssl cli 'Swiss army knife' tool doesn't support them purposefully.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]