3 ms·
A related key problem: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than is needed to produce it." -- https://en.m.wikipedia.
by RGamma 5y ago
A related key problem: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than is needed to produce it." -- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law
I also like this excerpt:
"In his 1786 Letters on Infidelity, George Horne writes that:
Pertness and ignorance may ask a question in three lines, which it will cost learning and ingenuity thirty pages to answer. When this is done, the same question shall be triumphantly asked again the next year, as if nothing had ever been written upon the subject. And as people in general, for one reason or another, like short objections better than long answers, in this mode of disputation (if it can be styled such) the odds must ever be against us; and we must be content with those for our friends who have honesty and erudition, candor and patience, to study both sides of the question."
- jim-jim-jim 5y agoSince being wrong is so low impact, we should have no problems entertaining crazy ideas then. Midwit Redditors who derive an inordinate amount of satisfaction from being correct all the time are ultimately stunted by their pride. When you've got a big beautiful brain, you understand that thinking is free and there's literally nothing wrong with shotgunning every schizo theory you come across and letting things work themselves out.