4 ms·
It seems like we are just going to disagree. Talk to literally anyone who works with this kind of information and they would laugh at your comment. Your require
by subjectsigma 5y ago
It seems like we are just going to disagree. Talk to literally anyone who works with this kind of information and they would laugh at your comment. Your requirements as written cannot be practically implemented at scale across all organizations accessing classified info. Read an Security Classification Guide sometime, you will very quickly understand. There has to be a policy somewhere that says "We know you can technically do $THING, but don't or you will go to jail."
EDIT: Sorry @dang I know I keep editing my comments a lot and you probably don't like that, but the more I think about it the more ridiculous these claims are the more miffed I get. Seriously, to all these people telling me that the NSA is just incompetent because someone went out of their way to commit a crime, imagine the following scenario: you tell someone a piece of classified information, they then walk over to an unclas computer and type that sentence in verbatim into their Gmail and hit 'Send'. Please design a crypto system, ACL, network architecture, workflow, any technical solution that could practically prevent that from happening across hundreds of organizations and probably millions of employees. I would bet you a lot of money you cannot.
- aaomidi 5y agoNone of what you're suggesting: 1. Undoes the damage done by the leak. 2. Prevents further leaks happening in the future. The only thing it does is ruin a person and their families life as they were entering retirement.
- subjectsigma 5y agoI have made it pretty clear that you are incorrect about #2 (in a practical sense, not a literal one). There's nothing more to say.
- aaomidi 5y agoProbably the case, I think we just fundamentally disagree on human behavior