3 ms·
This one does look pretty good. However, it still seems to requires classes for columns (which didn’t work on mobile), cards and a few other things. FYI, if y
by awb 5y ago
This one does look pretty good.
However, it still seems to requires classes for columns (which didn’t work on mobile), cards and a few other things.
FYI, if you’re interested in alternatives, I wrote a 100% classless CSS stylesheet that includes all of those elements:
https://andybrewer.github.io/mvp/ https://andybrewer.github.io/mvp/
- graderjs 5y agoI don't think it requires classes. I just looked at the code of the demo site, there's no classes on the first levels of the hierarchy at least body > main > :is(header, section, footer) ... etc .. I'm not seeing any classes looking at it in inspector. Also I don't know if you mean layout columns or table columns? Either way, I saw no classes in the table markup, and there seems to be no need to use classes for the layout columns (which are just done with a max-width on the body element) Not sure what you mean! :) ;P !! ;P ;) xxx ;P ):P)))
- awb 5y agoCheck out the “Extra Styling” section. Classes: * .sticky * .row * .col * .col-[1-12] * .card * .card .info * .card .warn It’s minimal, but not 100% classless, unless you stick to the basic styling, which isn’t as comprehensive.
- graderjs 5y agoOkay, but the demo I don't think uses any of those. And the strength of that demo (which is beautiful! and by your post seems totally classless heh :)) is what really contributed to me choosing to post it!! ;P :);p xx:p;)