3 ms·
It’s better in the short term. After one generation or two of unions getting stronger, everybody ends up losing. There were very strong unions (and rackets) alr
by SnowHill9902 5y ago
It’s better in the short term. After one generation or two of unions getting stronger, everybody ends up losing. There were very strong unions (and rackets) already some decades ago. See how it ended up.
- guerrilla 5y agoNope. Union membership has been extremely high in Sweden for ~5 generations and everyone benefits greatly from them. You'll find similar in a lot of Europe.