> with the destruction of animal habitats and climate change ( which feeds into the former), we'll probably see more epidemics from now on Shouldn't the null h

> with the destruction of animal habitats and climate change ( which feeds into the former), we'll probably see more epidemics from now on Shouldn't the null hypothesis be that a lack of animal habitats means fewer animals and less chance of zoonotic diseases emerging? I know it's tempting to blame all the world's problems on climate change, but we need to be careful not to exaggerate things and give climate change denialists weak arguments to attack. > Oh yes, QR codes surveillance. You may not feel that these systems have been, or would ever be, used against you, but unfortunately people in other countries might not be so lucky[0][1], and bad uses of technology have a way of spreading internationally. [0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/02/cybergulag-russia-looks-to-surveillance-technology-to-enforce-lockdown https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/02/cybergulag-rus... [1] https://theconversation.com/chinas-surveillance-creep-how-big-data-covid-monitoring-could-be-used-to-control-people-post-pandemic-164788 https://theconversation.com/chinas-surveillance-creep-how-bi...