4 ms·
What does “There’s no reason to think…” mean in this argument? What burden of proof does this line of reasoning impose? We are supposed to provide the absence
by zaroth 5y ago
What does “There’s no reason to think…” mean in this argument?
What burden of proof does this line of reasoning impose? We are supposed to provide the absence of an effect every time a modulation scheme changes, or otherwise must assume just the latest scheme is somehow a novel deadly cocktail?
- ncmncm 5y agoIt means that negative results for existing phones tells you literally nothing about effects of 5G phones. We are embarking on another very large-scale experiment on the general public, whose consequences will not be known for, most likely, decades, unless any harm is actually very large. Assuming it is not a novel deadly cocktail makes exactly as much sense as assuming it is one. We are in a condition of total ignorance, and have done nothing to reduce that ignorance.